The Kentucky State censorship case represents the first time a federal court has used the U.S. Supreme Court1s 1988 Hazelwood decision to justify censorship of college student publications. But it also represents another first: an outpouring of support for college press freedom from journalism schools and college journalism professors.
Tag: Spring 1998
U. of Penn found in violation of federal crime reporting law
The University of Pennsylvania was in compliance with federal laws when it defined its campus boundaries for purposes of reporting crime, the U.S. Department of Education concluded in February.
Proposed restrictions stem from politics
The inspiration for Senate bill no. 669 limiting the student press may have come from sour local politics. According to Gene Anderson, the attorney for one student who testified against the bill, the legislation has its roots in Great Bend's school board.
University of Kansas board fires editor
With only eight issues left in the fall semester, board members of the student newspaper at the University of Kansas fired its editor in November, claiming he was responsible for a series of decisions that offended readers and tarnished the Kansan's reputation.
No sports secrets at Illinois State; Athletic Council subject to law
The Appellate Court of Illinois has ruled that the Athletic Council of Illinois State University, an advisory body to the president and athletic director on athletic issues, is responsible for adhering to the state open meetings and open records acts.
Other state free press bills take a slow pace
State legislation to counteract the Supreme Court's 1988 Hazelwood decision has seen little success thus far in 1998.
American U. approves new freedoms
Members of the student press at American University no longer need to worry about being censored by the school's administration.
Nevada regents violated state law by use of phone calls and faxes
The Nevada Board of Regents violated the state open meetings law when it used phone calls and faxes to decide how it would respond to a publicly dissident regent, the state supreme court decided in April.
Suspension still spoils student's record; parents' $1 million civil suit continues
"Although student disciplinary hearings are serious and adversarial in nature, students are not entitled to the procedural protections of a criminal trial," Chief Judge Judith Kaye wrote in a unanimous decision for the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division in early December.
Free speech bill sees some movement
Rep. Bob Livingston, R-La., may see progress in a bill in which he has a special interest.