Skip to content
Welcome to the Student Press Law Center
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Get Legal Help
  • Donate
SPLC Logo

Student Press Law Center

  • Quick Guides
    • School Board Advocacy Toolkit
    • Covering Protests and Walkouts
    • Top 10 High School FAQs
    • Top 10 College FAQs
    • Yearbook Resources
    • SPLC en Español
    • Resources for educators
    • More …
  • Legal Topics
    • Legal Guides
    • Law Library
    • Amicus briefs
    • Legal Question of the Week
  • Tools
    • SPLC in the Classroom
    • Presentations
    • Quizzes
    • Public Records Letter Generator
    • FOI Lawsuit Template
    • FERPA Request Letter Generator
    • Financial Survival Strategies
    • Student Media Model Guidelines
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Press Releases
    • Behind the Story
    • New Voices news
    • Blog
  • Programs
    • New Voices
    • Student Press Freedom Day
    • New Voices Student Leaders Institute
    • Past Programs
  • About Us
    • About SPLC
    • Ways to Give
    • Legal Hotline
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • We’re Hiring
    • SPLC Store
  • Donate

Author: Lindsay Church

From the SPLC Legal Network: An analysis of the Supreme Court's latest First Amendment ruling, Matal v. Tam

News
July 12, 2017September 5, 2018 Lindsay Church

The Supreme Court avoided an expansive reading of the "government speech" doctrine in a closely watched trademark case that represents yet another blow against content-based government restrictions on speech under the Roberts Court.

Tagged attorneysnotes, First Amendment, FirstAmendment, intellectual property law, Lanham Act, recent-news

Student Press Law Center ⋅ 1608 Rhode Island Ave. NW, Suite 211 ⋅ Washington, D.C. 20036 USA
(202) 785-5450

splc.org/legalhelp

© 2023 Student Press Law Center
Read our Privacy Policy

Proudly powered by WordPress and hosted by Pressable