Judge orders Missouri students back to school while their off-campus speech lawsuit proceeds

A judge ruled two Lee’s Summit North High School students can return to school April 9 after being suspended for 180 days because of their blog, Northpress.tk.Steven and Sean Wilson are being allowed to return to school after creating and posting blog posts on the website, which district officials claimed disrupted the educational process.Senior U.S.

Bill letting Indiana schools punish off-campus conduct gets shipped to study committee, buying students a reprieve

On Wednesday, Indiana high school students celebrated "First Amendment Day" at the state Capitol -- and on Thursday, they got to keep their constitutionally protected freedoms safe for at least another year.By a vote of 88-0, the state House voted Thursday night to accept a much-diluted Senate version of HB 1169, a controversial measure that -- as originally filed -- would have enabled schools to suspend or expel students whose behavior anywhere, even at home, was considered an "interference with school purposes."Indiana schools currently can punish illegal conduct that disrupts or interferes with school, but HB 1169 would have allowed suspension or expulsion even for lawful behavior.Instead of granting schools the expanded disciplinary authority they sought, the bill as passed merely calls for the appointment of a 14-member study committee to look at "best practices for school discipline." Among the 14 members will be eight state legislators and three local school administrators; students will not be represented.State Rep.

Indiana’s HB 1169 risks unleashing zero-tolerance “government parents”

Unless an outbreak of common sense sweeps through the Statehouse, Indiana is about to become the most frightening place in America to be a kid.House Bill 1169, pushed by the special-interest lobbyists for school administrators, would unleash school principals to control essentially anything their students do – anytime, anywhere – that they disapprove of.The bill, sponsored by Rep.

Supreme Court’s online speech no-decision counts as a “win” for student First Amendment rights

The announcement that the Supreme Court will not hear any case this term involving the First Amendment rights of students punished for off-campus speech on social networking sites left one thing firmly established: That the law is not firmly established.That is not altogether a bad place to be.Considering the alternative.In 2007, the Supreme Court allowed itself to be swayed by sympathy for a put-upon high school principal in Juneau, Alaska, who made the ill-advised decision to snatch away a humorous banner that one of her students was waving at an off-campus event.