ARLINGTON, Va. -- Editors at the University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee's UWM Post filed suit today challenging their
college's claim that any document that identifies a student - even
the recording of a student's voice speaking at a public committee meeting
- is a confidential "educational record" that cannot be
released under Wisconsin's public-records law.
The
Post and its former editor-in-chief, Jonathan
Anderson, filed suit today in Milwaukee County Circuit Court, seeking a
declaration that the records sought by the
Post are covered by the
Wisconsin Open Records Law. The
complaint was filed by attorneys Robert J. Dreps
and Rebecca Kathryn Mason of the law firm of Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., a leading
media-law firm, representing the students as part of the
Student Press Law Center's Attorney Referral
Network.
Post editors were refused access to agendas,
minutes and audio recordings of meetings of the Union Policy Board, which makes
policy for the UWM Student Union, a campus cultural and recreational center.
Although the board meetings were open for members of the public to attend, UWM
Public Records Custodian Amy Watson denied the Post's request
almost entirely, claiming that the names of students - and even the sound
of their voices - are protected by the federal Family Educational Rights
and Privacy Act (FERPA), also known as the Buckley Amendment. Watson agreed to
release only heavily edited records - including an audio recording on
which all but one voice was erased.
The Post and its editors have been repeatedly
denied access to newsworthy public records under claims of FERPA privacy. Among
the information that student journalists requested, but were refused, included:
- The names of college employees who sit on student
disciplinary hearing panels.
- Travel records of student government officers who took
trips at taxpayer expense through
UWM
Anderson was presented with the 2009
"College Press Freedom Award" on Oct. 31 by the Associated
Collegiate Press and the Student Press Law Center for his persistence in
pressing for greater access to public records from UWM and its student
government association.
"FERPA is a confusing law that is badly in need of
clarification, but UWM's ultra-literal interpretation is the most extreme
and nonsensical that we have ever seen," SPLC Executive Director Frank D.
LoMonte said. "All laws are supposed to be applied in a common-sense
manner, but UWM has exhibited ‘zero tolerance for common sense' when
applying FERPA."
"Congress intended FERPA to protect truly
confidential information, such as grades, where there is no legitimate public
interest in disclosure. What people say at a government meeting is undeniably a
newsworthy matter of public interest. Just because the college puts public
information into a document or onto a tape, the information does not magically
become confidential," LoMonte said.
The complaint points out that the UPB is a public body
subject to the state's open-records and open-meetings laws, so that its
records are not the individual education records of any particular student. The
complaint also points out that other public bodies with student members,
including the Wisconsin Board of Regents, do not redact or withhold records of
meetings in which students participate.
"The Post disagrees with UWM's interpretation of FERPA.
We do not think Union Policy Board documents and recordings should be considered
an educational record. It's my hope that this action will ultimately lead to a
much needed clarification of this federal student privacy law," said Kevin
Lessmiller, the current Editor-in-Chief of the UWM Post.
Anderson, who is now the Post's special-projects
editor, said, "The university's assertion that FERPA was intended to
restrict disclosure of the records of the Union Policy Board - a powerful
governing body that has significant oversight over the allocation of state
resources and makes important policy decisions that greatly affect student life
on the UWM campus - cannot be countenanced."
The complaint names as defendants the Union Policy Board
and Watson as the university's public-records custodian. The complaint
seeks an order compelling the disclosure of all records requested by Anderson
and the Post, as well as an award of attorney fees.
Since 1974, the Student Press Law Center has been
devoted to educating high school and college journalists about the rights and
responsibilities embodied in the First Amendment, and supporting the student
news media in covering important issues free from censorship. The Center
provides free information and educational materials for student journalists and
their teachers on a wide variety of legal topics on its website at www.splc.org.
- 30 -
CONTACT:
Frank
D. LoMonte, Esq.
Executive Director
Student Press Law Center
(703) 807-1904
director@splc.org
For More Information:
< Return to Previous Page