NEW JERSEY — The student newspaper at Montclair State
University in Montclair, N.J., is taking the student government to court over
alleged open meetings violations. Student Government Association officials
maintain the state's open meetings act does not apply to them.
The American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey filed the
lawsuit on
behalf of the
Montclarion student newspaper on March 20 in Essex County
Superior Court. The suit alleges the SGA improperly went into a closed session
during a February meeting and then failed to provide minutes from that closed
session.
The disagreement centers around whether the SGA fits the definition of a
"public body" in the state's Open Public Meetings Act and Open
Public Records Act. University counsel has said that SGA's status as an
independent corporation means it is not subject to those laws. The lawsuit
claims SGA meets the "public body" requirements because it is
authorized to spend public money and performs a "governmental function
affecting the rights, obligations, privileges, benefits or legal relations of
any other person."
"It's important that the students know that they should be able
to hold the SGA accountable, because the SGA's decisions affect their
rights," said Ed Barocas, legal director for the ACLU of New Jersey.
In a prepared
statement, SGA President Ron Chicken said the group is
reviewing the lawsuit with legal counsel. He said the SGA has the right to go
into closed executive sessions and has only done so a limited number of
times.
"In such sessions, there are never secret votes or policies passed.
Any vote taken in an executive session is always included in the open meeting
minutes, as standard procedure, and revealed to the public," Chicken said.
"The only thing kept confidential in an executive session is
discussion."
The conflict started at a Feb. 4 student government meeting during a
discussion about whether SGA should revoke the charter of a Latin-American
student group for violations of the finance policies. Montclarion
Editor-in-Chief Bobby Melok, who was there taking photos, said it was a large
meeting with alumni and faculty attending to speak on behalf of the group.
The SGA officials suddenly retreated to an hourlong closed session without
any explanation, Melok said. At the end of the meeting he asked for minutes from
that session and Chicken told him to write a letter. Melok requested minutes in
a letter to Chicken and a public records request to the university. Like all the
Montclarion's previous records requests for SGA information, the
request was
denied.
University counsel Valerie L. Van Baaren wrote to Melok on March 6 that the
SGA is not a "public body" as defined by state law, and its meeting
minutes are neither a "government record" as defined by law nor
covered under citizens' common law right to public documents.
"Since the SGA is an independent corporation that is not subject to
either OPRA or OPMA, as Custodian of Government Records I am unable to provide
the documents you requested," she wrote.
SGA officials should not be allowed to make decisions behind closed doors
when they determine how much money a student group receives and even whether a
club can exist, Melok said.
"The students should have a right to know what the decision-making
process is and what goes on with their money," he said.
The Montclarion is intimately familiar with the SGA's power
over distributing money to student groups. In January 2008, the SGA froze the
Montclarion's funding after editors refused to hand over
correspondence with an attorney they had asked to investigate possible SGA
violations of the open meetings law. The threat of a lawsuit led the university
president to declare the Montclarion independent from the SGA as of June
2008. The newspaper now operates as a nonprofit corporation and receives funding
directly from the university.
By Lisa Waananen, SPLC staff writer