member
volunteer
newsletter
Make a Donation
FOI Letter Generator
Contact a Lawyer
Email This Page Print This Page

Student free-expression bill resubmitted in Wash. Senate

January 15, 2008

WASHINGTON — Student press advocates resubmitted a bill in the state Senate today that would add Washington to the list of states that protect public high school and college journalists from censorship.

Sen. Joe McDermott (D-Seattle) today submitted SB 6449, a student free-press bill almost identical to a proposal that passed the state House of Representatives in March 2007 but that failed to gain a vote on the Senate floor before the 2007 session expired. McDermott was joined by four co-sponsors, including Sen. Adam Kline (D-Seattle), chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

Like last year’s proposal, sponsored by Rep. Dave Upthegrove (D-Des Moines), the Senate bill makes student editors responsible for all content in school-sponsored media at public high schools and colleges, even if the student outlets are funded by the school or operate as part of a class. It forbids colleges from instituting mandatory prior review of a student publication. At the high school level, it allows administrators to review student media but to censor material only if it is obscene as to minors, libelous, "constitutes an unwarranted invasion of privacy" or incites students to break laws, violate school regulations or cause a material and substantial disruption of the school.

The bill would forbid administrators at both high schools and colleges from firing, transferring or otherwise disciplining media advisers "for refusing to suppress the protected free expression rights of student journalists." It also makes clear that schools and school officials cannot be sued or held responsible for material that runs in a student publication "unless school officials or the governing board have interfered with or altered the content of the student expression."

There are few substantive changes between this year's version and last year's. For example, this year's version clarifies that courts may award only "reasonable" attorney's fees to students who successfully sue their districts for violating the free-expression law. Brian Schraum, who helped lead efforts to get the bill passed while he was in high school and college, said that change was intended to blunt criticisms that the original bill might lead to costly judgments against school districts.

"I think the bill isn't fundamentally any different than it was last year," Schraum said.

McDermott, who served in the state House for seven years before being appointed to the Senate in October, said he first became interested in sponsoring the Senate version of the bill after meeting with editors of the Vashon Island High School Riptide. School administrators forced the paper to pull an article detailing concerns about a coach, and Principal Susan Hanson wrote in a letter to student editors that the student paper was not "an appropriate vehicle for airing concerns, complaints and criticisms of District staff."

"That's when I knew I was eager to prime sponsor the bill in the Senate," McDermott said.

In the past year, proponents have worked to organize support for the bill, forming the Washington Coalition for Responsible Student Expression. The 16-member coalition includes educators' groups such as the Journalism Education Association, media groups such as the Washington Newspaper Publishers Association and civil liberties organizations, including the Student Press Law Center.

Backers also have worked to allay the concerns expressed by the bill’s skeptics. Kathy Schrier, president of the Washington Journalism Education Association, said the group has been trying to convince principals, especially, that the bill "isn’t as threatening" as they might have first believed. In particular, the bill’s proponents have tried to dispel the belief that the bill would increase the number of lawsuits against schools, which Schrier said was one of the biggest concerns last year.

"The facts prove that just to be a fallacy," Schrier said, citing the experiences of the seven states that have passed similar legislation – including neighboring Oregon, where an anti-censorship law passed in July 2007.

Schrier said she thinks discussions with individual principals and with the Association of Washington School Principals — which opposed the bill last year — are having an effect. She pointed to increased collaboration between the Washington JEA and the principals group on sessions at conferences, as well as the fact that the principals group, in its fall magazine, ran columns supporting student editorial control over student media by both the principal and the media adviser at Mountlake Terrace High School.

Jocelyn McCabe, communications director for the principals group, said she also thought the association's members and the bill's proponents have gained a better understanding of each other's positions in the last year. But she said the association remains concerned at the prospect of "the removal of the principal in the advisory process."

Principals offer guidance and serve as the equivalent of the editors whom journalists would encounter in the professional world, McCabe said. "The student newspaper in a high school setting is a teaching tool. ... We believe that there needs to be some oversight."

And McCabe noted concerns among administrators that the bill's protections for media advisers would make those teachers essentially "untouchable." She said the association would review the new bill and likely decide within a week or two whether to take an official position on it.

The bill's backers are confident that it will gain approval in the House again but acknowledge that prospects in the Senate are uncertain. Last year, the bill faced strong opposition from the principals group and the Washington Association of School Administrators, which represents superintendents. The bill gained the Senate Judiciary Committee's approval only after the bill's sponsors agreed to an amendment that removed the protections for high school journalists, leaving only the college-level protections.

McDermott, who now serves on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he hopes to use the connections he made on the House Education Committee to build support for this year's bill.

Schraum, who graduation from Washington State University in December, said he hopes to see his years of work come to fruition.

Said Schraum, "We'll keep our fingers crossed and see where things go."

By Michael Beder, SPLC staff writer

© 2008 Student Press Law Center
 
Share

For More Information:
  • Pioneering Washington state press freedom bill dies in state Senate News Flash, 4/18/2007
  • Washington free press bill passes Senate committee without protection for high school students News Flash, 4/2/2007
  • Washington state Senate committee hears testimony regarding student free press bill News Flash, 3/30/2007
  • Washington state House of Representatives approves free student press bill News Flash, 3/13/2007
  • Washington legislator reintroduces amendment striking high schools from student free press bill News Flash, 3/2/2007
  • Washington student free press bill passes committee on party-line vote News Flash, 2/1/2007
  • Washington state judiciary committee hears testimony for student free press bill News Flash, 1/29/2007
  • Washington legislator introduces free press bill News Flash, 1/17/2007


    < Return to Previous Page


    SEARCH ARTICLES
    Advanced Search