Rachel Boim, then a ninth-grader at Roswell High School,
was suspended and nearly expelled in October 2003 for keeping a journal with the
violent entry. A federal judge in Atlanta dismissed Boim’s First Amendment
lawsuit last year because, the decision reads, her writing was
“sufficiently disturbing” to merit discipline. The 11th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals also agreed with the school and cited the U.S. Supreme
Court’s recent decision in Morse v. Frederick in its ruling.
According to court documents, Boim’s notebook was discovered when
she was caught passing it to another student during class. The teacher
confiscated the notebook and found that, under a divider labeled
“Dream,” Boim had written about shooting a male math teacher.
“I stand up and pull the gun from my pocket. BANG the force blows
him back and every one in the class sit [sic] there in shock,” she
wrote.
The teacher reported the notebook to Fulton County School
District officials, who expressed concern that the student’s writing
constituted a threat against her male math teacher. The school suspended Boim
and attempted to expel her, but the Fulton County Board of Education overturned
the expulsion on an appeal by Boim. The Boim family filed suit two years later
to take the suspension off Boim’s record, arguing that the school’s
actions violated the First Amendment. But the district court found that the
school was within its rights, prompting the family to appeal to the 11th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Court of Appeals upheld the lower
court’s decision that the Fulton County School District’s concerns
were justifiable by referring to violent incidents on school grounds, such as
the Columbine High School and Virginia Tech University shootings. The appeals
court ruling, authored by Judge Joel F. Dubina, notes that there had been at
least 10 student perpetrated shootings at U.S. schools in the eight years prior
to Boim’s suspension, citing statistics from Wikipedia, an online
user-created encyclopedia, and an article posted on CNN.com.
The
decision cites the student speech standard established by the 1969 Supreme Court
decision in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District,
arguing that Boim’s speech could create a “substantial
disruption” in the school. The decision also cites Morse, in which
the Supreme Court upheld a school’s right to punish a student for hoisting
what it interpreted as a banner advocating illegal drug-use, to conclude that,
“the same rationale applies equally, if not more strongly, to speech
reasonably construed as a threat of school violence.”
“There
is no First Amendment right allowing a student to knowingly make comments,
whether oral or written, that reasonably could be perceived as a threat of
school violence, whether general or specific, while on school property during
the school day,” the court opinion said.
“As we
feared,” said Student Press Law Center Executive Director Mark Goodman,
“Courts are using Morse as authority to justify acts of censorship far
beyond the circumstances of that ruling.”
Judge Susan H. Black
wrote in a concurring opinion in Boim v. Fulton County School District
that stated the court’s decision could have been decided under the
Tinker standard alone.
Although she lost in the appeals court,
Boim can continue the two-year-old case by asking for a rehearing by the full
11th Circuit or by appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court, if she chooses.
Carol Callaway, an attorney for the school district, said she is pleased
that the court upheld a school official’s right to act in the
school’s best interests in light of a “perceived threat.” She
said she is unsure whether the Boim family will continue the
lawsuit.
Boim’s attorney, Don Keenan, could not be reached for
comment.
Boim wrote for her school’s student newspaper, The
Sting.
By Judy Wang, SPLC staff
writer
© 2007 Student Press Law Center
Share
For More Information:
Boim v. Fulton County Sch. Dist., No. 06-14706-JJ, 2007 WL 2177677 (11th Cir. July 31, 2007).
< Return to Previous Page